Uncategorized

C&S Electric acquisition is margin accretive: Siemens: Sunil Mathur, MD & CEO, Siemens India

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Tuesday, NIFTY closed at 12,060 (-0.5% down its previous close).  The top gainers for the day were BPCL (+2.5%), HDFC (+1.6%) and Bajaj Finance (+1.2%). The stocks that were down in today’s session included Vedanta (-4.5%), Bharti Airtel (-4.4%) and Tata Motors (-3.2%). The sectoral gainers for the day were NIFTY Financial services (+0.3%) and NIFTY IT (+0.3%). The top losing sectors were NIFTY Metal (-2.4%), NIFTY Auto (-1.2%) and NIFTY Media (-1.1%).

Excerpts from an interview with Mr Sunil Mathur, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Siemens India from Livemint dated 28th January 2020:

  • C&S Electric is an excellent acquisition for them. They are in a space that is a market for the future. Infrastructure is a huge market in India. A lot needs to be done and this is in the low voltage space of infrastructure.
  • They were present in low voltage but very strong on the industrial side. What they lacked was a presence on the infrastructure side.
  • They are looking at smart infrastructure as being a thrust area for them in the country and so this is perfect in that space. So, strategically it is a very good growth area and it is EPS accretive as well.
  • C&S Electric did about ₹1,200 cr in terms of revenue and profitability in the range of 10-15% in last year. They are growing very well.
  • They see a huge potential in this business not only from a domestic purpose but also from an export perspective. They see markets that are hugely competitive and what they would like to use this acquisition for is to also develop a manufacturing hub here and they can use them for design and manufacturing into low-cost markets outside the country.
  • The profitability is in the 10-15% range, and if we look at the multiples from that perspective, both the revenue multiples as well as the EBITDA multiples, they are very comparable to the Schneider-L&T deal as well as compared to a lot of the other deals in the same space.
  • It will improve RoCE because they are sitting on a lot of cash. They have ₹5,000 cr of cash. This is a ₹2,000 cr acquisition. So this should improve their RoCE and as it is margin accretive so it will help return on investment (RoIs) as well.
  • A lot of it depends on when they get the regulatory approvals and when they start up over there, but if we take a volume of ₹1,200 cr topline and take a 10% bottom line and we are already there. Of course, that is a starting point.
  • For export businesses, they will have to use their global network to start getting into customers and introducing their products to customers. So, they will build this up over a period of time but the potential is huge.
  • The multiples today are terrifically high and so they have got to balance all that together and see whether it makes sense or not.

Consensus Estimate: (Source: market screener website)

  • The closing price of Siemens Ltd was ₹ 1,502/- as on 28-January-2020. It traded at 49x/ 36x/ 31x the consensus earnings estimate of ₹ 30.5/ 41.7/ 48.6 for FY20E/ FY21E/ FY22E respectively.
  • Consensus target price is ₹ 1,462/- which implies a PE multiple of 30x on FY22E EPS of ₹ 48.6/-

Rajiv Bajaj recommends 3 steps to revive growth in the auto industry

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Monday, NIFTY closed at 12,119 (-1.1% down its previous close).  The top gainers for the day were Dr Reddy (+5.6%), M&M Ltd (+1.9%) and CIPLA (+1.2%). The stocks that were beaten down in today’s session included Vedanta (-4.8%), Tata Steel (-4.7%) and JSW Steel (-4.3%). The only sectoral gainer for the day was Nifty Pharma (+1.5%). The top losing sectors were Nifty Metal (-3.1%), Nifty PSU Bank (-2.3%) and Nifty Bank (-1.3%).

Excerpts from an interview with Mr Rajiv Bajaj, MD, Bajaj Auto Ltd on CNBC-TV18 on 23rd January 2020:

  • Mr Rajiv Bajaj, MD, Bajaj Auto said if the auto industry has to be put back on 15 per cent growth track then the government would need to do three simple things:
  1. The mandatory insurance that was brought into play in September 2018, should be rolled back.
  2. Imposing the anti-lock braking system (ABS) on 150 CC or 200 CC scooters or motorcycles was complete overkill and he urges the government to consider recalibrating this to at least for 250 CC plus two-wheelers.
  3. At a time when goods and services tax (GST) for electric vehicles (EVs) had been correctly lowered to 5 per cent, the government should also consider lowering GST for petrol or diesel vehicles from 28 to 18 per cent.

However, if these things are not done, then he anticipates around 20% plus decline from March or April once BS-VI prices come into play.

  • The industry has been systematically done in by over-regulation. This over-regulation, whether it is of insurance or of safety norms and now BS-VI, has pushed up the cost of two-wheelers ranging from between 20% and 30%, depending on whether it is a small or a big vehicle. If one is going to have this kind of cost escalation in a 12-18-month period then it is bound to have an impact on volumes.
  • Sharing his rationale for why mandatory insurance should be removed, he said that people are riding all kinds of two-wheelers, people are living in all kinds of circumstances. If somebody is buying a little vehicle that can do no more than 50 kilometres an hour, and living outside the city, there is no crazy traffic and he doesn’t have to be overly concerned as long as he is wearing a helmet then that choice should be left to him.
  • When asked about rural demand growth and whether there are any signs of recovery, he said he doesn’t see any signs of that.
  • In terms of sales, according to him, January is slightly better than December because December was impacted by a huge pre-buying in October. January-February would be better.
  • The auto industry is going to continue to see a decline in volumes, manufacturers are also very concerned about the billing of BS-IV and how things may pan out because there are two views again, one is that in March, Companies will have a lot of pre-buying of BS-IV and the other view is that they may not.
  • He said three years back when they moved from BS-III to BS-IV they had to follow their competition that put out discounts ranging from Rs 7,000 to Rs 25,000. Bajaj Auto don’t make that kind of money on most of their motorcycles. So, it is better to produce BS-VI, to let go of BS-IV because if one is left with BS-IV inventory with the dealers then between the dealer and manufacturer, the manufacturers are going to suffer a lot of pain.
  • Most of the auto players will be selling only BS-VI vehicles from March – from the middle of March or so. Bajaj Auto would not want to carry BS-IV stock beyond the first week of March etc. The Company has planned their production accordingly. Thus, he added saying, “If that means we are going to lose some share in March because competition will have heavy discounts on BS-IV vehicles and push up their share for the month, we are not playing that game”.
  • According to him, BS-VI models are going to be 15-20% more expensive which means a definite decline in the volumes. Thus, nobody knows the exact degrowth number but it is going to be very significant.

Consensus Estimate: (Source: market screener website)

The closing price of Bajaj Auto Ltd was ₹ 3,082/- as on 23-January-2020. It traded at 18.2x/ 17.0x/ 15.3x the consensus earnings estimate of ₹ 170/ 182/ 202 for FY20E/ FY21E/ FY22E respectively.

For the next 3 years, we will set aside Rs 90,000 mn Capex, says Hari Mohan Bangur, Managing Director, Shree Cement

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Friday, Sensex ended up 227 pts higher and ended at 41,614 level and Nifty settled 68 pts higher at 12,248 level.  Pre-budget rally and decent Q3FY20 results throughout the day were the biggest factors driving the markets.

Among the sectors, Nifty Media (+1.0%), NIFTY Metal (+1.0%), NIFTY Financial Services (+0.9%) and NIFTY Bank (+0.8%) were the top-performing indices. All the key indices settled in the positive territory barring Nifty IT and Pharma indices. Among stocks, Powergrid, Cipla, Tata Motors and IndusInd Bank were among major losers on the Nifty, while gainers were AU Small Finance, Yes Bank, Ultracemco, Britannia and Tech M.

For the next 3 years, we will set aside Rs 90,000 mn Capex, says Hari Mohan Bangur, Managing Director, Shree Cement

Edited excerpts of an interview with Hari Mohan Bangur, Managing Director, Shree Cement; dated 24th January 2020:

  • Shree Cement is the country’s second-largest cement producer. It backed out of the race to acquire Emami Cement as it wants to focus on organic growth.
  • Company has raised Qualifies Institutional Placement (QIP) for the first time since listing decades ago.
  • The funds raised via QIP will be used to fund capacity expansion planned over a period of six years, a part of it will also be from internal accruals. The amount raised and the internal generation are expected to suffice the planned growth.
  • Shree Cement is a zero debt company and expects to maintain the status.
  • The expansion strategy or the target of the company is to reach at least 55 mn tonnes per annum (mtpa) by FY23. The current installed capacity is 41.9 mtpa and it will go up to 75-80 mtpa in the next six years. More capacities will come in North, East and South India where Shree Cement already has a strong presence and clinkerisation units.
  • The capex for the next 3 years is expected to be around Rs 90,000 mn. The capex projection for the next 6 years is difficult to say as it depends on many factors like USD behavior and market position.
  • Organic growth will be the prime focus for Shree Cement. As organic growth takes time, planning is started early. Presently, various projects are at different stages, some of which had started 10 years back.
  • If acquisition is available at reasonable cost it can be looked upon. Acquisition depends on the infrastructure in totality. USD 75-80 per tonne is the cost of putting a new unit, anything near to this rate or cheaper can be looked as an acquisition opportunity.
  • There is no competition between Ultratech and Shree Cement as they are growing at their own speed and their speed doesn’t challenge Shree Cement even though both are in the same business.
  • World GDP growth rate will be less than 3% and even with revised growth estimates, India’s GDP growth will be more than that.

Consensus Estimate: (Source: market screener, investing.com website)

  • The closing price of Shree Cement was ₹ 23,180/- as of 24th January 2020. It traded at 52x/ 41x/ 34x the consensus EPS for FY20E/ FY21E/ FY22E of ₹ 445/565/674 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 19,917/- implies a PE multiple of 30x on FY22E EPS of ₹ 674/-.

Huge concern among buyers to invest in under-construction projects, says Rajnish Kumar, chairman, State Bank of India (SBI)

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Tuesday, Sensex ended up 92 pts higher and ended at 41,952 level and Nifty settled 30 pts higher at 12,362 level. Among the sectors, Nifty Media (+2.1%) and FMCG (+1.4%) were the top-performing indices while Nifty Private Banks closed 0.5% lower. Among stocks, Yes Bank, Indusind Bank, UPL, Reliance and Kotak Mahindra Bank were among major losers on the Nifty, while gainers were Vedanta, Britannia, Hero Motocorp, Zee Entertainment, MnM and ITC.

Huge concern among buyers to invest in under-construction projects, says Rajnish Kumar, chairman, State Bank of India (SBI)

Edited excerpts of an interview with Rajnish Kumar, Chairman, SBI; dated 13th January 2020:

  • SBI is coming up with a product where the bank backs up a builder to whom the bank has given loan and the buyer who buys homes from that builder will be guaranteed his principal no matter what happens to the builder. This is a product is for all Bank’s home loan buyers.
  • The purpose of this product is that there is a huge concern among the home buyers whenever they want to invest in under-construction projects and SBI finances them anyway, so the bank is taking project risk whenever they are giving a home loan for buying any flat in any project.
  • The level of due diligence which will be done in this case on the builder will be much higher. There is a clear advantage because SBI’s commitment on a particular project whether it is the guarantee of funding to the builder or the home loans on that particular project, they would be within the defined limit.
  • This product is SBI’s brainchild and builders are taken by pleasant surprise by this kind of thinking by the bank.
  • SBI has signed up with Sunteck. An MoU has been signed for three projects and for all these three projects due diligence will be done before approving the amount and the projects.
  • SBI is getting huge interest and a huge number of queries regarding this product.
  • The cost of the loan is same as far as borrower is concerned. As far as guarantee fees are concerned that will be charged to the builder. The financing cost for the builder is fairly high in today’s market, so there is arbitrage available and through this, there is a win-win situation for all the three — the homebuyers, the builder and the bank.
  • Home loan still continues to be one of the most profitable product for the bank.
  • SBI loan the portfolio consists of the salaried class which is a major segment for the bank. Among the non-salaried class, SBI is not as active. Among the salaried class, the defence employees, the central government, the state government, the state-owned undertaking employees are the major contributors to this segment making SBI’s market segment different. This is the reason why the percentage of NPA is very low and comparable to the best in the industry.
  • Any major economic slowdown will naturally impact SBI. However, the loan to value ratio is very low, the average is 60%. So in such a scenario where the loan to value ratio is very low and the stability of income is better, SBI is very hopeful of growing their home loan portfolio and at the same time maintaining its quality.
  • In the case of Bhushan Power, as soon as the legal stay by NCLT gets vacated, SBI expects the transaction to be closed within the next couple of days.

Consensus Estimate: (Source: market screener, investing.com website)

  • The closing price of SBI was ₹ 328/- as of 13th January 2020. It traded at 1.3x/ 1.2x/ 1.0x the consensus Book Value per Share estimate for FY20E/ FY21E/ FY22E of ₹ 251/282/324 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 377/- implies a PBV multiple of 1.2x on FY22E BVPS of ₹ 324/-.

We have targeted 10-15% growth in gold loan -V.P. Nandakumar, Manappuram Finance

Excerpts from an interview of Mr V.P. Nandakumar, MD, and CEO, Manappuram Finance with Live Mint dated 13-01-2020:

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Monday, NIFTY closed +0.6% higher. Among sectoral indices NIFTY Realty (+2.1%), NIFTY IT (+1.7%), NIFTY Metal (+1.2%) closed higher. None of the sectoral indices closed on a negative note. The biggest gainers were Infosys (+4.7%), IndusInd Bank (+3.7%) and Coal India (+3.1%) whereas Yes Bank (-5.8%), Bharti Infratel (-1.2%), and UPL (-1.2%) ended with losses.

  • Mr Nandakumar says, the all-inclusive cost is expected to be around 11%. on January 13, 2020, the company will finalize the hedging portion.
  • The coupon rate is 5.9%. The hedging rate is yet to be finalized.
  • Mr Nandakumar says they want to diversity liability and this is a new addition.
  • The incremental cost is 9.2%, this is costly, but diversification of liability is needed as there are liquidity challenges in the non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) sector and the company is a little more cautious about that.
  • So far, the company has not been affected.
  • Speaking about the slowdown in vehicle financing, Mr Nandakumar says, they do not lend to fleet owners.
  • Primarily the thrust area is lending to the operators who have one-two trucks, this segment remains stable.
  • Recoveries remain the same. The company will be achieving around 30-35% growth in the commercial vehicle (CV) finance this year.
  • The company has targeted 10-15% growth in gold loan and they are confident to achieve it.

Consensus Estimate (Source: market screener and investing.com website)

  • The closing price of Manappuram Finance was ₹ 177/- as of 13-January-20. It traded at 2.6x / 2.1x / 1.8x the consensus Book Value for FY20E / 21E / 22E of ₹ 65.7/81.3/97.6 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 177/- implies a Price to Book multiple of 1.8x on FY22E Book Value of ₹ 97.6.

Five Behavioural Resolutions for Investors in 2020

Joe Wiggins wrote this excellent article on his website.

The notion of a New Year’s resolution now seems more associated with lofty aspirations and hasty failures, rather than substantive and prolonged change.  Yet for investors caught in the daily cacophony of market volatility, financial news and perpetual performance assessment; opportunities for genuine reflection are scarce. Most of us spend our time dealing with the noise of the present rather than considering how we might make better long-term investment decisions.

Even if introspection over the New Year period doesn’t result in a dramatic change, any occasion that affords investors even a modicum of space for contemplation away from every day should be grasped readily.  And for those investors in need of resolutions to follow, here is a shortlist of simple (but not easy) goals driven by insights from behavioural science:

Make a set of market / economic predictions for the year ahead: Most of us are aware of our general incompetence at making forecasts and predictions, but most of us engage in it anyway.  In order to disabuse any notions of prescience, simply write down some market forecasts for the year ahead and then review them in 12 months’ time. This will provide a cold dose of reality.  This task should be carried out each year to prevent us from getting carried away if we get lucky with one round of predictions.

Check your portfolio less frequently: The best defence against most of our debilitating behavioural biases is to engage with financial markets less regularly. The more we review short-term performance and pore over every fluctuation in the value of our portfolios, the more likely it is that we will make poor, short-term decisions. The common wisdom that being ‘all over’ our portfolio is some form of advantage is almost certainly one of the most erroneous and damaging beliefs in investment.

Read something/someone you disagree with each week: Confirmation bias is incredibly damaging for investors and its influence appears to have been exacerbated by the rise of social media. We follow those who share our principles and read articles we know we will agree with, whilst haranguing those with contrary views.  This is easy and it makes us feel good.  The problem, however, is that there are things that we currently believe that are wrong, and if we live in an echo chamber we are unlikely to find out what they are.

Keep a decision log: Our memories are incredibly fickle. It is not simply that we forget things, but that we re-write history based on information that we receive after we have made a decision. It is almost impossible to learn from our past judgments unless we have a clear and simple record of what we were thinking (and feeling) at the time we made a decision.

Be comfortable doing nothing: Particularly for professional investors, the pressure to act can be overwhelming. Financial markets are in a perpetual state of flux and uncertainty, and investors are expected to constantly react: “something has changed, what are you doing about it?” Doing nothing can be seen as lazy, negligent or incompetent when in the majority of cases it is the best course of action.  Sticking to your principles and enjoying the long-term benefits of compounding sounds easy, but the behavioural realities of investment mean that this is far from the case.  Doing nothing requires a great deal of effort.

Demand has been quite decent: Subbu Subramaniam, Chief Financial Officer, Titan Co. Ltd

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Monday, NIFTY50 closed -0.13% higher at 11,936. NIFTY50 gainers includes BPCL (+2.2%), Axis Bank (+2.1%) and Adani Ports (+2.0%). NIFTY50 losers includes TCS (-3.0%), HCL tech (-1.6%) and Cipla (-1.3%). Auto (+0.8%), Metal (+0.5%) and Financial Services (+0.4%) were the top gainers and Realty (-1.6), IT (-0.9%), and Media (-0.8%) were the top losing sectors.

Excerpts from an interview with Mr. Subbu Subramaniam, CFO, Titan Co. The interview was published in Livemint dated 05th December 2019.

  • Titan has embarked on Omni channel in five flagship stores in Bengaluru. They are planning to adopt Omni channel across all their divisions. Their websites are done; their e-commerce platforms are quite robust now.
  • The Omni part has just about started; they are starting with the watch division. They have started it with Bengaluru, but this could get rolled out fairly quickly.
  • Even as they start rolling out for the watch division across the country, they may  start in a couple of months in Tanishq, as well in jewelry division.
  • So, Omni is going to be the way they will all do business. People can look at a product anywhere, whether it is online or offline, and choose to take the goods from anywhere. So, that is the strategy, it is more of an enabler.
  • Jewelry margins depend to a large degree on top-line growth, because that is where economies of scale work and the operating leverage kick in. On a gross margin basis, they are generally in the same ballpark as they have been.
  • As they stand right in the middle of the quarter, he restrained from giving any number at this point in time, but EBIT should generally, be in the ballpark of growth – margins that we have been having in the financial year.
  • Demand has been quite decent. November itself has not been bad. Despite Diwali being a little early, demand has been generally fine. Of course, they also had more promotions, which was required under the circumstances. The wedding season has been quite decent.

Consensus Estimate (Source: market screener, Investing.com website)

  • The closing price of Titan Co. was ₹ 1,175/- as of 09-December-19. It trades at 68x/ 49x/ 41x the Consensus EPS estimate for FY20E/ FY21E/ FY22E of ₹ 18.7/ 23.9/ 29.0 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 1,216/- implies a PE multiple of 42x on FY22E EPS of ₹ 29/-

The Price of Excellence

Jon writes on his blog that some people happily pay a premium for quality. If you think a product — like iPhones, designer bags, or shoes — is higher quality, it might be worth paying more. Sometimes you actually get more than your money’s worth. Other times, the premium is the cost of being associated with the logo. It’s no different from stocks. Investors pay a premium for stocks labelled “quality” or “excellent.” Sometimes, it’s worth it.

In 1987, Michelle Clayman tested the performance of so-called “excellent” companies based on fundamentals relayed in the book In Search of Excellence. The book labelled 36 publicly traded companies as “excellent” based on specific fundamental criteria: asset growth, equity growth, return on capital, return on equity, return on sales, and price to book. At the same time, she tested 39 “disaster” companies. These were the worst companies based on the same criteria. Over a five year period, the disaster companies beat the excellent companies handily! This result was repeated over studies conducted by Barry Banister over a longer period of time.

Here’s how Clayman explained the unexpected results: Over time, company results have a tendency to regress to the mean as underlying economic forces attract new entrants to attractive markets and encourage participants to leave low-return businesses. Because of this tendency, companies that have been “good” performers in the past may prove to be inferior investments, while “poor” companies frequently provide superior investment returns in the future. The “good” companies underperform because the market overestimates their future growth and future return on equity and, as a result, accords the stocks overvalued price-to-book ratios; the converse is true of the “poor” companies.

Banister concluded that while financial “excellence” is a laudable management achievement, he found that it tends to produce a high-priced stock with the potential for downward mean reversion. It is his view that a more rewarding investment strategy over time is the purchase of a portfolio of equities in financially solvent companies whose abysmal growth record of late has washed the last glimmer of hope out of the stock price. As the “Un-Excellent” companies revert to the mean, their stock performance is anything but average.

Jon concludes that the market is a popularity contest driven by short-term thinking. Short-term thinking would suggest that great companies will continue to do great and poor companies will continue to do poorly and nothing will change that. The reality is far different. Poor companies may never become great or even good companies, but their fundamentals mean revert. The same happens to good (and most great) companies too. In the long run, the market reflects it in prices.

UPL eyes ₹5600 mn of synergies from Arysta deal

Update on the Indian Equity Market:On Thursday, Sensex ended higher led by gains in financial services and IT sectors, Sensex gained 170 pts and Nifty ended at 11,872. Retail inflation jumped to 4.62% in October from 3.99% in September. Vodafone Idea fell 20.27% after the department of telecommunications (DoT) asked operators to conduct a self-assessment of pending dues after last month’s Supreme Court verdict that upheld the government’s definition of adjusted gross revenue.
Among sectoral Indices, BSE IT was the biggest gainer with a rise of 1.1% followed by BSE Consumer Durables 0.9% and BSE Finance 0.8%.  BSE Telecom lost the most at 2.8%, BSE Metal was down 2.0% and BSE Capital Goods slipped 0.8%.
Among stocks, ICICI Bank Ltd, Bajaj Finance Ltd, HDFC twins—HDFC Bank Ltd and HDFC Ltd, Axis Bank Ltd, and Yes Bank were the biggest gainers in the financial services sector. In the tech sector, Infosys Ltd, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, and Tech Mahindra Ltd gained the most.



UPL eyes ₹5600 mn of synergies from Arysta deal
Key takeaways from the interview of Mr Anand Vora, Chief Financial Officer, UPL; dated 11th November 2019:

  • When asked about the Arysta acquisition and synergies, Mr Vora mentioned that UPL has already achieved Rs 3200 mn of synergies and targets ~ Rs 5600 mn of total synergies benefit to reflect in Profit and Loss Account for FY20.
  • Mr Vora said that the EBITDA margins will improve to about 16-20% due to the merger.
  • He commented on the tough external environment factors like the trade war and swine flu, not letting UPL take any price increase to push the volumes.
  • Mr Vora added that the debt increase is due to the seasonality of the business and high working capital which will decrease significantly after December as cash inflows start against the receivables and this has been the trend for the last three years.
  • He stated that the receivables have decreased as compared to last year and UPL is working in that direction. On average the net working capital of Arysta is higher than UPL but they are working on it and expect the working capital to trend closer to that of UPL.  
  • When asked about the pressure on demand globally, he commented that they are in crop protection chemical business and farmers rarely keep their land vacant. In fact, once they have invested in seeds and spent on fertilizers, they are left with no choice but to use the crop protection chemical to protect their crops.

Consensus Estimate (Source: market screener website)

  • The closing price of UPL was ₹ 535/- as of 14-November-19 and traded at 17.5x /11.5x /9.8x the consensus EPS for FY20E / 21E / 22E of Rs 31/47/55 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 704/- implies a PE multiple of 12.8x on FY22E EPS ₹ 55/-.

Fashion segment grew in double-digits on a base of 18-20%: Mr Kishore Biyani, CEO, Future Group

Update on the Indian Equity Market:

On Wednesday, NIFTY closed up with 0.5% gain at 11,844. GAIL (+6.3%), Grasim (+3.6%) and SBI (+3.5%) were the top NIFTY50 gainers. Infratel (-5.2%), Yes Bank (-3.6%) and Cipla (-2.1%) were the top NIFTY50 losers. Among the sectors, NIFTY PSU BANK (+3.7%), NIFTY IT (+1.4%) and NIFTY FMCG (+1.0%) were the top performers while NIFTY MEDIA (-0.6%), NIFTY REALTY (-0.5%) and NIFTY AUTO (-0.3%) were the top losers.

Excerpts from an interview with Mr Kishore Biyani from Livemint on 30th October 2019:

  • Festive demand starts in August sometime with Onam for Kerala and that did quite well. Followed by Puja in the Eastern part of India which again did very well. Dussehra in some parts of India also did well.
  • Diwali started a little late and the business picked up from September and till now they have been seeing some very good traction on Diwali also, but it picked up late.
  • They deal in food, fashion as such. For food, the consumption continues. It is all about some category shifts here and there. Fashion surprisingly has done well for them.
  • Men’s fashion has changed significantly in terms of what a man is wearing and after a while, the change has come in. So, change is making fashion drive that business. Value fashion has done well.
  • Central has done phenomenally well which is a departmental store format which has achieved its numbers.
  • Women’s fashion has been a little slower than what it used to be last year and they are seeing some shifts in footwear also.
  • With the wedding season starting November onwards, they expect to see a lot of shifts which are going to happen. This summer, weddings were much slower, so any category which was related to wedding had seen some kind of sluggishness, whether it was personal care, beauty, footwear —anything related to the wedding saw some moments which were much slower than expected.
  • The larger ticket size items definitely, which we are hearing in terms of auto sales, real estate sales, consumer durables have held on onto some categories, again some categories have seen some slowdown there, but in smaller ticket items also we are seeing some variation.
  • Fashion has done very well in 2018. So they are looking at a huge base of growth of 18-20%, but fashion would have grown in double-digits in 2019 for them.
  • Non-fashion, food in the first quarter grew quite well. Second-quarter has been little lower than Q1, but nevertheless, the growth continues.
  • Foodhall is breaking even and Foodhall, in fact, has probably done better. Now they have three Foodhalls in Mumbai and four in Delhi. This festive season Foodhall has done brilliant numbers because of the gifting backlog they had. A lot of gifting orders they had picked up this year.
  • ₹650 crore of extra EBITDA in Future Retail definitely helps in the long term to build a very strong balance sheet.

Consensus Estimate (Source: market screener & Investing.com website) 

Future Retail:

  • The stock price was ₹ 383/- as of close price of 30th October and traded at 22x /23x /20x the consensus EPS for FY20E / 21E / 22E of  17.4/ 16.9/ 19.5 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 560/- implies a Price to earnings multiple of 29x on FY22E EPS of ₹ 19.5/-.

Future Lifestyle Fashion:

  • The stock price was ₹ 410/- as of close price  of 30th October and traded at 38x /31x /28x the consensus EPS for FY20E / 21E / 22E of Rs 10.8/ 13.5/ 15.0 respectively.
  • Consensus target price of ₹ 555/- implies a Price to earnings multiple of 37x on FY22E EPS of ₹ 15.0/-.